If there was a car that was designed to kill the most people in the fastest way possible, that car would be banned, and the car manufacturer would be sued/held accountable/out of business.
Guns designed to kill 10-20 objects without reloading are killing humans. They are not hunting squirrels.
Guns have those restrictions too
Pretty much every single thing mentioned there applies to guns.
LAC once again proving their complete and utter ignorance.
Must be a day ending in Y
With thanks to @you-stand-corrected:
If Guns Were Regulated Like Cars
If Cars Were Regulated Like Guns
It really must suck not being able to go into government builds, airports, certain stores because the owners put a sticker on the window. Having to have a special permit to go outside your home in certain states.
we require female immigrants to remove 11 out of 20 specified parts of their body then replace them with American prosthetics.
also they can only enter the country if they can conceivably play a sport
certain women are just flat out banned
some women can easily just be banned for no given reason
Women under an arbitrary height are banned.
Women in California who are pregnant with too many fetuses at once are banned.
Those arms gotta be 16" or longer, ladies.
Unless you want to pay the government a $200 SAR (Short Arm Reach) tax.
If you don't, it's a $250k fine and up to 10 years in prison...
It must be painful to be this stupid
Apparently, it isn't painful at all.
Fun fact! Having a job every day is actually a fairly new thing.
In olden times, people had daily chores and other things to do but their workload/ daily working hours was actually much lower than it is today. Even in farming communities.
The concept of working super hard every day actually comes from capitalism, which in turn comes from Puritanical ideology.
The Puritans believed in salvation through work and in no play.
Early capitalists adopted this ideology because it meant higher productivity and therefore more money if their factories were running near constantly.
The idea of needing to be continuously productive in order to be useful/ allowed things like food and shelter, is actually quite an insidious ideal that is deeply rooted in the American culture.
4 day work weeks have actually proven to be more productive than the 5 day week. But corporations won't adopt it willingly because it means less of a stranglehold on their workers.
So, if you're doing a labor-type job instead of a creativity-based job, doing four 10-hour shifts in a week (with at least one break in the middle of course) is more productive than five 8-hour shifts. [if you're in a creativity-based job, most people become worthless after 3-4 hours and might as well go home]
On the business side of things, a lot of your shift at work is burned in setting things up, breaking things down, not starting a new task because you know that you're not going to be able to finish it before you clock out... having fewer shifts means you go through less of those wasted segments while still doing the same number of hours on the clock, which means more of your time is actually being productive.
And on the personal side, you're putting in 25% more time on a work day (not counting commute time, which is totally wasted), but you're increasing your number of days off by 50%. That's huge. More opportunities to get together with friends or family, more possibilities for trips you could take without going into actual vacataion time... or just switching from 'one day to recover from the work week, one day to dread the next one' to having a whole day in the middle between those things all to yourself. And being better rested means you're more alert, which means you do more work and dramatically reduce the chances of accidents, which could be costly or actually dangerous.
But the problem is, a lot of modern companies aren't actually interested in profit. They don't give a fuck about efficiency. They want control, both over the customers and the workers, and they're willing to lose a lot of money to get it.
I have a theory about the cases that Phoenix was helping Edgeworth with during the 7 years gap
Those institutions need to fail and not get bailed out, what the fuck are you guys not getting
The government owning business is fascism
This would create a perverse incentive for the government to force businesses into failure so the state can take control.
Heck, a lot of businesses fail because the government failed to do their actual jobs, or actually contributed to the problem, with the best of intentions.
Like the Subprime Crisis, which was partially caused by government attempts to increase low-income home ownership.
